🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “complete double standards” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Correspondence acquired by reporters sent from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the nation's political leaders demands plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The tobacco firm seeks modifications of a proposed legislation that include reductions in the recommended coverage of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavored smoking items, and diminished punishments for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” said Master Chimbala.

Thousands of residents a year pass away from tobacco-related illnesses, according to global health agency statistics.

The advocate mentioned the letter was known to have been circulated to several government departments and was in circulating through civil society groups.

International corporate influence worries

This occurs during wider concerns about industry interference with health policies. In recent weeks, international health experts sounded an alarm that the tobacco industry was increasing attempts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“We see evidence of corporate influence worldwide. Tobacco company fingerprints are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN summit conference,” commented the tobacco industry watchdog.

Likely impacts

“When public health regulation isn’t passed because of this letter, the price could be paid in human lives who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and mandating that graphic health warnings cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Through correspondence, the company recommends this be decreased to thirty to fifty percent “within the WHO-FCTC suggested parameters”, postponed for minimum twelve months after the bill passes.

Global health authorities actually suggests a alert needs to encompass at least half of the product container front “and attempt to encompass as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. In the UK, warnings are required to occupy 65% of a product container sides.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The company seeks the removal of broad restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, suggesting that it would push consumers toward “illegally traded” products. The corporation recommends restricting fewer varieties of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for multiple violations “ranging from a portion of yearly revenue to a decade in prison”.

Corporate defense

Via documentation, the managing director of the African subsidiary says the firm is “committed to ethical business practices” and “endorses the aims of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the associated health impact” but claims that “specific rules can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The advocate stated the corporation's recommended amendments would “weaken this legislation so much that the necessary effect for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that multiple comparable regulations were present in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “total double standard”, he commented.

“We reside in a global village. Should I grow cigarettes in my back yard and harvest that and distribute the goods – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to benefit personally and all the future family lines while my neighbor's family are dying … is in itself total emotional bankruptcy.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the United Kingdom or other countries had not resulted in corporate closures, the advocate mentioned. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. It only protects the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative commented: “The corporation runs its operations according with relevant national regulations. Further, the corporation engages in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which provide for relevant group engagement in legislation creation.”

The company was “not opposed to regulation”, the spokesperson stated, noting that minors should be shielded from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We advocate for evolving legislation to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while accepting the variety of privileges and responsibilities on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the spokesperson stated, mentioning that BAT’s proposals “mirror the circumstances of the African nation's economy and cigarette sector, which involves growing volumes of illicit trade”.

The country's office of trade, commerce and industry was approached for comment.