🔗 Share this article

In a notable legal reversal, the Australian classification review board has reversed a earlier ruling that blocked viewers in Australia from accessing recorded content of the violent event involving influencer Charlie Kirk. This challenge was lodged by Elon Musk's company X, which contested an directive sought by the online safety regulator.

Background on the Original Classification Ruling

Following the death of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University in September, the eSafety commissioner petitioned the classification board to assess and rate the available footage. It initially ruled the content was "unable to be classified", a rating that empowered the commissioner to order social media companies to restrict access to the posts for an Australian audience.

The platform X challenged the decision for a pair of videos related to the Kirk incident. Additionally, it contested a similar ruling on another piece of footage—depicting the attack on Iryna Zarutska on a train in Charlotte—which had likewise been classified as "unacceptable for distribution".

The Platform's Case and Final Ruling

In its appeal, X contended that the Kirk video contained only brief violence with no visible weapon. It was argued the recording was low-quality and the camera quickly panned away from the victim to the surrounding crowd.

The social media giant argued the video was not excessively detailed, exploitative, or offensive, adding that it served as a neutral objective record of "a significant incident of historical and political significance that prompted extensive public discourse". X even compared the video and the historic film of the JFK shooting.

Most members of the review board ultimately agreed that, "despite the terrible nature of the event," the content did not reach a level that was gratuitous, exploitative or offensive enough to warrant a 'refused classification' rating. However, they noted that a more detailed depiction with different editing might have resulted in a different ruling. As a result, the panel revised the rating of the content to R18+.

The Minority Opinion

A minority on the board held a contrary view, contending the video was "content designed for sharing for the probable aim of entertainment and/or personal gain (such as likes, shares, or views)". This view stated the comparison to the Zapruder JFK film was invalid, as the Kennedy video was released long after the event, "once emotions regarding it had calmed".

Response Following the Decision

Posting on its official policy channel, the platform welcomed the ruling.

"We challenged this case to uphold freedom of expression and the importance of access to information about issues of public interest. We remain dedicated to protecting these fundamental values."

Representatives for the eSafety commissioner acknowledged the ruling, but noted that the revised classification now means platforms "have obligations to ensure R18+ material being displayed to users under 18".

Recent Developments on Sensitive Footage

In related news, the regulator has not issued formal notices to platforms this week regarding disturbing videos from the recent Bondi beach terror attack shared across social media. The regulator stated that while the images were distressing, they did not reach the required standard for a "total ban" rating.

As an alternative, platforms have been advised to apply warning labels and screens, such as obscuring the image, on this material in line with their existing community guidelines.